<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trash All IE CSS Hacks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/</link>
	<description>The adventures of a freelance web designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a regularly occurring situation: We make a proposal; we assume we&#039;ll spend time on browser compatibility (even if we need to make no true IE hacks, IE&#039;s rendering is still the least predictable and the most costly to us in development hours); someone underbids us.

But I guess the same could be said of accessibility, standards-based design, etc.  They&#039;re things about which we have to educate clients.  Not easy, especially in a smaller market.

I&#039;m just glad most of my work is now in application development, where browser compatibility is a smaller proportion of the budget (not because it&#039;s less important, but because we&#039;re often working within proven designs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a regularly occurring situation: We make a proposal; we assume we&#8217;ll spend time on browser compatibility (even if we need to make no true IE hacks, IE&#8217;s rendering is still the least predictable and the most costly to us in development hours); someone underbids us.</p>
<p>But I guess the same could be said of accessibility, standards-based design, etc.  They&#8217;re things about which we have to educate clients.  Not easy, especially in a smaller market.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just glad most of my work is now in application development, where browser compatibility is a smaller proportion of the budget (not because it&#8217;s less important, but because we&#8217;re often working within proven designs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Mabbitt</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4207</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Mabbitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/#comment-4207</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a self-correcting problem.  I would agree that the design community should take action to move end-users away from IE6 if it wasn&#039;t going to happen naturally on its own.  People get new computers that come with the latest browsers.  For some people, it just takes a decade or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a self-correcting problem.  I would agree that the design community should take action to move end-users away from IE6 if it wasn&#8217;t going to happen naturally on its own.  People get new computers that come with the latest browsers.  For some people, it just takes a decade or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avinash</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator>Avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/#comment-4192</guid>
		<description>Ian, 

I completely agree with your points. I saw the Web Designer Wall article on Digg. After reading the article, I realized that I wasted a few minutes reading an article that was misleading designers. 

Any skilled designer will love to make his web projects   cross-browser compatible. IE 5.x and 6 still capture about 50% share. How can one ask to ignore 50% web surfers?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, </p>
<p>I completely agree with your points. I saw the Web Designer Wall article on Digg. After reading the article, I realized that I wasted a few minutes reading an article that was misleading designers. </p>
<p>Any skilled designer will love to make his web projects   cross-browser compatible. IE 5.x and 6 still capture about 50% share. How can one ask to ignore 50% web surfers?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4189</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/#comment-4189</guid>
		<description>Exactly- one case in point is IE on the Mac. It&#039;s been abandoned and unused long enough that my clients are comfortable with me not supporting it. It&#039;s a pity that we had to support it down into it&#039;s grave, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly- one case in point is IE on the Mac. It&#8217;s been abandoned and unused long enough that my clients are comfortable with me not supporting it. It&#8217;s a pity that we had to support it down into it&#8217;s grave, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4188</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/08/09/trash-all-ie-css-hacks/#comment-4188</guid>
		<description>I agree; By not supporting IE6, you&#039;re giving your competition an edge.  Users of IE6 that go to your site will think your site is broken and will instead go to a competitors site.  Unfortunately this might be something designers will have to continue to deal with until the percentage of IE6 users are negligible enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree; By not supporting IE6, you&#8217;re giving your competition an edge.  Users of IE6 that go to your site will think your site is broken and will instead go to a competitors site.  Unfortunately this might be something designers will have to continue to deal with until the percentage of IE6 users are negligible enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
