<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blasting the Myth of the Fold</title>
	<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/</link>
	<description>The adventures of a freelance web designer</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/#comment-4703</link>
		<author>Teresa Hernandez</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/#comment-4703</guid>
		<description>A quick clarification on email/webpage-scrolling (in general), and the Circuit City example (specifically)...  In our studies at Eyetools (www.eyetool.com), we have observed that users are very willing to scroll several screen lengths down a page that is 1- informative and 2- easy to scan.  

True, most users won't read all of the content in pages that are 6+ screen scrolls long.  And as you might expect, almost no one reads the small print at the bottom of online content.  However, many times we see designs that assume users don't scroll, and  effectively "give up" on trying to capture attention in the lower half of the page.  It's important to stress that the design elements and copy throughout the page can be used to communicate critical information.

The Circuit City email was an example of an email format that is very commonly used by large retailers. This specific format performs very poorly in the vast majority of our tests.  Just as a note, viewing below the fold is poor here because the design did not guide the user's eyes effectively... not because users didn't scroll.  Even in this example, 50% of users scrolled at least 2 screen lengths, and 33% got most of the way through.  Improving the template would greatly improve scrolling as well as read-through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick clarification on email/webpage-scrolling (in general), and the Circuit City example (specifically)&#8230;  In our studies at Eyetools (www.eyetool.com), we have observed that users are very willing to scroll several screen lengths down a page that is 1- informative and 2- easy to scan.  </p>
<p>True, most users won&#8217;t read all of the content in pages that are 6+ screen scrolls long.  And as you might expect, almost no one reads the small print at the bottom of online content.  However, many times we see designs that assume users don&#8217;t scroll, and  effectively &#8220;give up&#8221; on trying to capture attention in the lower half of the page.  It&#8217;s important to stress that the design elements and copy throughout the page can be used to communicate critical information.</p>
<p>The Circuit City email was an example of an email format that is very commonly used by large retailers. This specific format performs very poorly in the vast majority of our tests.  Just as a note, viewing below the fold is poor here because the design did not guide the user&#8217;s eyes effectively&#8230; not because users didn&#8217;t scroll.  Even in this example, 50% of users scrolled at least 2 screen lengths, and 33% got most of the way through.  Improving the template would greatly improve scrolling as well as read-through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/#comment-3798</link>
		<author>Douglas Karr</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>Here's some info on email and 'above the fold' vs 'below it': http://blog.eyetools.net/eyetools_research/2007/07/eyetracking-cir.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s some info on email and &#8216;above the fold&#8217; vs &#8216;below it&#8217;: <a href="http://blog.eyetools.net/eyetools_research/2007/07/eyetracking-cir.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.eyetools.net/eyetools_research/2007/07/eyetracking-cir.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/#comment-3790</link>
		<author>Ian</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/#comment-3790</guid>
		<description>I think the advent of the mouse wheel really helped things along here. It's a fantastic invention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the advent of the mouse wheel really helped things along here. It&#8217;s a fantastic invention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/#comment-3772</link>
		<author>Douglas Karr</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ianlabs.com/2007/07/29/blasting-the-myth-of-the-fold/#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>IMHO, with RSS it's a myth... with a Web Page it's a maybe... and with HTML Email I think it's still important.

There are specific elements of a web page you don't want to trust someone to scroll to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, with RSS it&#8217;s a myth&#8230; with a Web Page it&#8217;s a maybe&#8230; and with HTML Email I think it&#8217;s still important.</p>
<p>There are specific elements of a web page you don&#8217;t want to trust someone to scroll to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
